The “new normal” of post-pandemic strategy development.
Just as the last year presented unprecedented management challenges, post-pandemic strategy development conversations will face issues never...
3 min read
Cecilia Lynch
Jun 4, 2018 10:07:00 AM
This a really important question as planning happens all the time and as this question suggests at different levels and with different scopes of influence. Before I answer this, first some definitions:
The corporate strategy is the broadest and most long-ranging. It must be developed first to provide direction to the business and functional area planning efforts where the activities are planned and managed. So, it is the largest doll that all the others fit into.
The business strategy is next. The business strategy is informed by the corporate goals, the success or challenges of the current strategy, the business’ market conditions including shifts in customer preferences, market innovations, and regulatory shifts.
The functional area strategy is last. Functional areas exist to serve the business and the corporation as well as their particular discipline, so they have multiple masters. They need to carefully examine the corporate and business strategic plans for direct or indirect objectives and create a strategy to respond to those needs. Additionally, they need to evaluate their strengths and performance and plan to exceed their standard of performance. Finally, they need to stay on par if not ahead of the innovations or regulatory change in their field.
One area of strategy development not mentioned by critical for this set of connected strategies is the brand strategy. Just as in most Russian doll designs, each doll has a similar look and feel. You can tell they are a set or related to one another. This is also true with strategy; the strategy that connects all the strategies is the brand strategy. In the development cycle, it is either incorporated into the corporate strategy or developed after the corporate and before the business strategy.
How do you keep them all connected? This is both incredibly difficult and practically simple: the planning processes. Like all great strategic thinking, you start at the end and work backward.
To ensure all strategy components stay connected and provide aligned guidance requires a very deliberate planning and managing process driven from the corporate level through the functional areas. Yet all too often this objective is led by the CFO or controller's office in as part of annual budgeting not necessarily integrating levels of strategic thinking. The role of ensuring strategic plans are created and connected is a full-time job that should be sponsored by the CEO and given the resources to stay on track.
This is one of those investments that pay off tremendously in the long run. This “neutral party” role has many benefits, not the least of which is to escalate issues up and down the planning chain rapidly so disconnect are spotted and address promptly or changes to planning assumptions are identified and discussed as soon as they are visible. Ultimately, the goal of this role is for the company to stay vision driven and market responsive.
Learn how to combat the common causes of strategic plan failure:
Just as the last year presented unprecedented management challenges, post-pandemic strategy development conversations will face issues never...
Last weekend felt like the beginning of the beginning. Like many here in the US, my family celebrated the start of summer by joining two other...
There always seems to be a lot of planning going on. However, not all planning efforts are the same: different processes produce different results. ...